Skip to content Skip to main navigation Report an accessibility issue

“Hate Speech” Informative Outline Example

This preparation outline represents the common structure of an informative speech. Remember that your teacher or instructor is the final authority on how you structure your speech and how you write its outline. This outline merely represents what is common.

See our “Organization” page for more specific advice on how to construct your speech.

Also, your teacher may require that your preparation outline contain citations.

Topic: Hate Speech

Presenter: Namey McNamara

  1. Introduction
    1. I will present and explain an image of a person holding a controversial sign at a funeral. (Slide 1)
    2. I will provide background regarding the case of this person picketing the funeral of a gay man with anti-LGBT messages.
    3. Rhetorical question: Is this hate speech?
  2. Body
    1. Transition/establish context.
      1. I will summarize and provide statistics on the public’s view of hate speech. (Slide 2)
      2. I will reference a popular comedian’s take on what he views is hate speech.
      3. I will reference a comedian being accused of hate speech as an illustration.
    2. I will give the legal definition of hate speech. (Slide 3)
    3. I will summarize and explain the most important legal precedent defining hate speech.
      1. I will quote the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and explain the relationship between the “free speech” and “hate speech” ideas. (Slide 4)
      2. I will explain “unprotected speech” under Chaplinsky vs New Hampshire (1942). (Slide 5)
        1. I will define “fighting words” and display an example. (Slide 6)
      3. I will explain the “imminent danger” test as it is laid out in Brandenberg vs Ohio (1969).
        1. I will quote the speech in question in that case and provide an image. (Slide 7)
      4. I will summarize Snyder vs. Phelps (2011), which involves the response to the case presented in the introduction. I will quote the court’s judgment. (Slide 8)
  3. Conclusion
    1. Transition: “Bigoted speech acts are not necessarily uncommon.”
    2. I will reference current cases of bigoted expression in news reports and provide images. (Slide 9)
    3. I will reference recent hate-driven cases of domestic terrorism and ask the question, “Was this the result of hate speech?”
    4. I will conclude with the question, “Who should decide whether speech is or is not free?”
Social Links